Cities That Are Losing People: Where Americans Are Fleeing

Every year, people are on the move. Some are leaving for work, others for college. However, there are a few cities that are losing people more frequently than others. 

According to USA Today, each year about 14% of the US population moves at least once. Now, a lot of that number includes people moving within their city or state. However, it also covers people moving out of city or state for work, school, retirement, or a more affordable cost of living.

As you might expect, not all cities are created equally. There are some states and cities that are losing people more rapidly than others. High tax states, for example, are seeing their populations fleeing to some degree or another. This would include New York, Connecticut, Illinois, and California just to name a few.

At a more local level, here are the cities that are losing people the most, according to USA Today.

Cities That Are Losing People

The data from USA today includes metro areas as well as surrounding regions.

5. Cleveland-Elyria, Ohio

  • Population decrease due to migration, 2010-2017: -33,117
  • Population change, 2010-2017: -0.9% (2,077,271 to 2,058,844)
  • Natural growth, 2010-2017: 168,361 births, 153,138 deaths
  • Median home value: $146,100

4. St. Louis, Missouri-Illinois

  • Population decrease due to migration, 2010-2017: -39,894
  • Population change, 2010-2017: +0.7% (2,787,763 to 2,807,338)
  • Natural growth, 2010-2017: 246,280 births, 186,111 deaths
  • Median home value: $169,200

3. Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Michigan

  • Population decrease due to migration, 2010-2017: -54,640
  • Population change, 2010-2017: +0.4% (4,296,317 to 4,313,002)
  • Natural growth, 2010-2017: 364,121 births, 293,091 deaths
  • Median home value: $160,700

2. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, California

  • Population decrease due to migration, 2010-2017: -93,959
  • Population change, 2010-2017: +4.1% (12,828,961 to 13,353,907)
  • Natural growth, 2010-2017: 1,202,115 births, 578,750 deaths
  • Median home value: $578,200

1. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin

  • Population decrease due to migration, 2010-2017: -296,320
  • Population change, 2010-2017: +0.8% (9,461,541 to 9,533,040)
  • Natural growth, 2010-2017: 869,178 births, 501,469 deaths
  • Median home value: $229,900
Chicago should not be a surprise. High cost of living and new taxes are starting to take their toll. in fact, according to some statistics: roughly half of Chicago residents can’t afford where they live. 
The cost of living in some parts of the country are getting too much to bear for some citizens. It’s no wonder that Chicago is one of the cities that are losing people.

A Matter of Location

When it comes to cost of living, location matters a great deal. The taxes and cost of living in Chicago are not the same as Beaumont, Texas. Manhattan, New York is very different from Manhattan, Kansas.

State and local taxes, housing costs, and more will vary depending on which city you live. If you happen to live in one of the cities that are losing people, odds are good you already know this.

You may even be thinking of moving yourself and joining the 14% of Americans who make the decision every year. For that, there’s City vs City.

City vs City calculates cost of living expenses at the zip code level using real, local data. If you’re wondering how your cost of living would change if you were to move to a different city, we can help.

Simply input your data and select the zip codes you’d like to compare. As a result, you’ll see a side by side comparison of costs. You’ll know if that move is a step up or step down from a cost of living perspective.

If you’re thinking of moving away from one of the cities that are losing people: download City vs City today and start comparing.